Concrete Design · Reference problem
Plated Composite Shear Wall — SpeedCore Example 3-2
An AISC SpeedCore worked example compared at a fixed axial load in Mx–My space.
Saved model
Problem overview
This case compares a RETUG concreteJS fixed-P M–M result with the AISC plastic-moment point for Example 3-2, a plated composite C-shaped shear wall. The supplied model retains the P = 0 and P = -3,770 kip demand cases so the example can be opened directly in the application.
- Section
- Uncoupled C-shaped SpeedCore wall; 120 in flange length × 480 in wall depth
- Concrete
- f′c = 6 ksi; 17 in concrete cover regions inside 0.5 in plates
- Steel
- Fy = 50 ksi; 0.5 in face plates
- Verification load
- P = -3,770 kips; RETUG Mx and My are plotted at fixed P
- Published result
- AISC plastic-moment point: Mx = 731,416.67 kip-ft, My = 0
- Saved demand checks
- P = 0 and P = -3,770 kips, M2 = 734,166.67 kip-ft, M3 = 0
Results
Published vs. computed
119 RETUG M–M angles · 1 AISC point
The supplied RETUG fixed-P result is compared in Mx–My space with the published AISC plastic-moment point. The plotted nominal curve keeps the weak-axis My component visible.
Hover over a point for its values. Use the legend to show or hide a series.
How points are matched. The supplied RETUG fixed-P result is plotted in Mx–My space. The 0° nominal point is compared with the published AISC plastic-moment point at the same target axial load; Mx and My are retained as separate components.
| Point | Published Mx | RETUG Mx | Ratio | Δ Mx | Difference | Published My | RETUG My | Δ My |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic moment · P = -3,770 kipsRETUG angle 0.00° | 731,416.7 | 713,254.4 | 97.5% | -18,162.2 | 2.5% | 0.0 | -38,193.8 | -38,193.8 |
Difference (%) = 100 × |RETUG − AISC| / |AISC|. Because the published My is zero, a relative My percentage is undefined; the signed My delta is shown instead. Small differences may round to 0.0%.
Comparison notes
- The AISC design example reports a plastic moment of 8.81 × 10⁶ kip-in, or 734,166.67 kip-ft. The comparison point uses the supplied 731,416.67 kip-ft value shown for the plotted AISC result.
- The supplied RETUG result has a small nonzero My at 0° because the plated composite wall is unsymmetric about the weak axis.
- The attached model keeps its two demand cases: P = 0 and P = -3,770 kips, with M2 = 734,166.67 kip-ft. Load cases are preserved in the downloadable JSON for opening in the application.
- The source request contained 7,314,166.67 in one line; the comparison interprets that as 731,416.67 kip-ft to match the cited kip-in capacity and the supplied plot scale.